WITH THE NAMELESS

WITH THE NAMELESS front cover 750 20161218_114520
76 Pages

WITH THE NAMELESS
(1991-1996)

The nameless is the beginning of  Heaven and  Earth…

Did knowledge invent the reason
for its own existence?
/ the reason – as explained need /
 


 

*

Nobody is interested in reason anymore, everybody wants result.
Nobody knows what the essence is anymore, and everybody wants truth.
 
 

*

The quest for the TRUTH is the quest
for the lost spirit,
for the exiled child.

Lie is a temptation of thinking
or a child of truth that apostatize itself
and is now searched for.

Truth is a public joy but a personal tragedy,
general disappointment but personal satisfaction.

The individual made the distant truth with his own assuredness,
liberating himself from responsibility,
separating spirit from body,
and himself from society by estrangement,
replacing his and mine liberation.

The truth is,
it does not cease,

it becomes a lie when we do not believe in it anymore
and so remains: TRUTH and maker of lies.
 
 

*

Whose glance from a cube made of glass
walked dreams along the wall?
Whose thoughts stayed out of
this unfinished poem?

Whose world remained forbiden
without somebody’s game?
Whose is this wall of glass
childs tears?

Whose glance are these cubes
which arrange thoughts of mine
in a dream
in dreams?
Whose is the glass wall
that does not give mine?
If I brake it, I will break what is mine
the glass town – the glass man.

The glass wall is not a wall,
the glass wall does not give mine:
the glass wall – the glass man.

UNSHED TEARS THAT THERE ARE
 
 

*

LIBERTY

LIBERTY is not a chain and it does not bind, liberty obligates to the limit of self-responsibility, than there remains LIBERTY,
where assurance about the righteousness of our actions is not suficient guarantee that liberty will bring public welfare, if it does not answer the claims of community.

– By taking responsability we become free.

– Breaking the previous thinking – as its present route
and stepping into a new space, which the cognition will geather and determine again with edges, as a path of its new sighting and our liberty, as a new creation – of free thinking.

Liberty is in our knowledge, liberty is in our ignorance, in the crashing of both of them; meaningful coincidence – as an order or coincidence
– that is its end.

LIBERTY is a thought which does not have a definition.
 
 

*

Brave is the man whose desire for victory overcomes the fear of defeat, with yet untested outcome.

– The one who has nothing to lose is – desperate.

– Man without fear is as unreliable as the one with exaggerated fear.

– Dangerous is everyone that losing something,
the one who is winning has already shown how dangerous he is.

– Only those who are less successful or unsuccessful need a will, while successful ones have abilities.
For them, a motivation is what counts and the motivation is the wish to help the will.

– Strong is the man who owns something that is not for sale.

– Man is the weakest at the crossing;
that is the place of an ambush
and the time of a crime:
the path from man
to the superman.
 
 

*

SHARK

If we trace the steps of progress as a condition of survival,
can we
guess its begining?

Because, the only certanty is:
we start
and end in the middle.

To whom do we owe the begining?

Human progress owes gratitude to its own
thinking,
which is the result of needs of previous thinking
– giving birth
to a new need in the new thinking.

So, human progres – that is what arise from man’s
need
to setisfy his thinking, in other words, survival.

…So far, the disappearance of all previous living beings
as different as they were,
was followed (or caused) by natural perturbations.

What are we afraid of? Or are we waiting for some
natural perturbation – if with this way of life
we justify
our thinking: as an imposed need for survival,
or are we ourselves, perhaps, that same perturbation that is not
natural but is nature’s.

It will be rather
hard to convince anybody:

If thinking derived from
controlled imagination which came from free imagination
as an expression of spirit and not instinct,
what had we (if we had?) left behind
in the previous cycles.

– It seems that man took to much responsability
at the moment when Adam created Eve from his rib,
trying to free himself from the sin which
Eve will commit later on. It seems,
it will not be able to carry much longer.
Does this means that we shall soon whitness the end,
and some others will witness the new birth?

– In the next episode we shell find out:
“Is God angry with Adam”?

(What is written in the book “ON CAUSE AND SENSE”)

(Note: The book is not yet translated in English)